Exploring History
Last updated on 2024-03-12 | Edit this page
Overview
Questions
- How can I identify old versions of files?
- How do I review my changes?
- How can I recover old versions of files?
Objectives
- Explain what the HEAD of a repository is and how to use it.
- Identify and use Git commit numbers.
- Compare various versions of tracked files.
- Restore old versions of files.
As we saw in the previous episode, we can refer to commits by their identifiers. You can refer to the most recent commit of the working directory by using the identifier HEAD
.
We’ve been adding one line at a time to mars.txt
, so it’s easy to track our progress by looking, so let’s do that using our HEAD
s. Before we start, let’s make a change to mars.txt
, adding yet another line.
BASH
nano mars.txt
cat mars.txt
OUTPUT
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity
An ill-considered change
Now, let’s see what we get.
BASH
git diff HEAD mars.txt
OUTPUT
diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
index b36abfd..0848c8d 100644
--- a/mars.txt
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity
+An ill-considered change.
which is the same as what you would get if you leave out HEAD
(try it). The real goodness in all this is when you can refer to previous commits. We do that by adding ~1
(where “~” is “tilde”, pronounced [til-duh]) to refer to the commit one before HEAD
.
git diff HEAD~1 mars.txt
If we want to see the differences between older commits we can use git diff
again, but with the notation HEAD~1
, HEAD~2
, and so on, to refer to them:
git diff HEAD~3 mars.txt
OUTPUT
diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
index df0654a..b36abfd 100644
--- a/mars.txt
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -1 +1,4 @@
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
+The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
+But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity
+An ill-considered change
We could also use git show
which shows us what changes we made at an older commit as well as the commit message, rather than the differences between a commit and our working directory that we see by using git diff
.
git show HEAD~3 mars.txt
OUTPUT
commit f22b25e3233b4645dabd0d81e651fe074bd8e73b
Author: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
Date: Thu Aug 22 09:51:46 2013 -0400
Start notes on Mars as a base
diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..df0654a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
In this way, we can build up a chain of commits. The most recent end of the chain is referred to as HEAD
; we can refer to previous commits using the ~
notation, so HEAD~1
means “the previous commit”, while HEAD~123
goes back 123 commits from where we are now.
We can also refer to commits using those long strings of digits and letters that git log
displays. These are unique IDs for the changes, and “unique” really does mean unique: every change to any set of files on any computer has a unique 40-character identifier. Our first commit was given the ID f22b25e3233b4645dabd0d81e651fe074bd8e73b
, so let’s try this:
git diff f22b25e3233b4645dabd0d81e651fe074bd8e73b mars.txt
OUTPUT
diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
index df0654a..93a3e13 100644
--- a/mars.txt
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -1 +1,4 @@
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
+The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
+But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity
+An ill-considered change
That’s the right answer, but typing out random 40-character strings is annoying, so Git lets us use just the first few characters (typically seven for normal size projects):
git diff f22b25e mars.txt
OUTPUT
diff --git a/mars.txt b/mars.txt
index df0654a..93a3e13 100644
--- a/mars.txt
+++ b/mars.txt
@@ -1 +1,4 @@
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
+The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
+But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity
+An ill-considered change
All right! So we can save changes to files and see what we’ve changed. Now, how can we restore older versions of things? Let’s suppose we change our mind about the last update to mars.txt
(the “ill-considered change”).
git status
now tells us that the file has been changed, but those changes haven’t been staged:
git status
OUTPUT
On branch main
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: mars.txt
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
We can put things back the way they were by using git checkout
:
git checkout HEAD mars.txt
cat mars.txt
OUTPUT
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity
As you might guess from its name, git checkout
checks out (i.e., restores) an old version of a file. In this case, we’re telling Git that we want to recover the version of the file recorded in HEAD
, which is the last saved commit. If we want to go back even further, we can use a commit identifier instead:
BASH
git checkout f22b25e mars.txt
BASH
cat mars.txt
OUTPUT
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
BASH
git status
OUTPUT
On branch main
Changes to be committed:
(use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
modified: mars.txt
Notice that the changes are currently in the staging area. Again, we can put things back the way they were by using git checkout
:
BASH
git checkout HEAD mars.txt
Don’t Lose Your HEAD
Above we used
BASH
git checkout f22b25e mars.txt
to revert mars.txt
to its state after the commit f22b25e
. But be careful! The command checkout
has other important functionalities and Git will misunderstand your intentions if you are not accurate with the typing. For example, if you forget mars.txt
in the previous command.
BASH
git checkout f22b25e
ERROR
Note: checking out 'f22b25e'.
You are in 'detached HEAD' state. You can look around, make experimental
changes and commit them, and you can discard any commits you make in this
state without impacting any branches by performing another checkout.
If you want to create a new branch to retain commits you create, you may
do so (now or later) by using -b with the checkout command again. Example:
git checkout -b <new-branch-name>
HEAD is now at f22b25e Start notes on Mars as a base
The “detached HEAD” is like “look, but don’t touch” here, so you shouldn’t make any changes in this state. After investigating your repo’s past state, reattach your HEAD
with git checkout main
.
It’s important to remember that we must use the commit number that identifies the state of the repository before the change we’re trying to undo. A common mistake is to use the number of the commit in which we made the change we’re trying to discard. In the example below, we want to retrieve the state from before the most recent commit (HEAD~1
), which is commit f22b25e
:
So, to put it all together, here’s how Git works in cartoon form:
Simplifying the Common Case
If you read the output of git status
carefully, you’ll see that it includes this hint:
OUTPUT
(use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
As it says, git checkout
without a version identifier restores files to the state saved in HEAD
. The double dash --
is needed to separate the names of the files being recovered from the command itself: without it, Git would try to use the name of the file as the commit identifier.
The fact that files can be reverted one by one tends to change the way people organize their work. If everything is in one large document, it’s hard (but not impossible) to undo changes to the introduction without also undoing changes made later to the conclusion. If the introduction and conclusion are stored in separate files, on the other hand, moving backward and forward in time becomes much easier.
Recovering Older Versions of a File
Jennifer has made changes to the Python script that she has been working on for weeks, and the modifications she made this morning “broke” the script and it no longer runs. She has spent ~ 1hr trying to fix it, with no luck…
Luckily, she has been keeping track of her project’s versions using Git! Which commands below will let her recover the last committed version of her Python script called data_cruncher.py
?
Option 1$ git checkout HEAD
Option 2$ git checkout HEAD data_cruncher.py
Option 3$ git checkout HEAD~1 data_cruncher.py
Option 4$ git checkout <unique ID of last commitdata_cruncher.py
Option 5
Both 2 and 4
The answer is Option 5 (both 2 and 4).
The checkout
command restores files from the repository, overwriting the files in your working directory. Option 2 and 4 both restore the latest version in the repository of the file data_cruncher.py
. Option 2 uses HEAD
to indicate the latest, whereas option 4 uses the unique ID of the last commit, which is what HEAD
means.
Option 3 gets the version of data_cruncher.py
from the commit before HEAD
, which is NOT what we wanted.
Option 1 can be dangerous! Without a filename, git checkout
will restore all files in the current directory (and all directories below it) to their state at the commit specified. This command will restore data_cruncher.py
to the latest commit version, but it will also restore any other files that are changed to that version, erasing any changes you may have made to those files! As discussed above, you are left in a detached HEAD
state, and you don’t want to be there.
Reverting a Commit
Jennifer is collaborating with colleagues on her Python script. She realizes her last commit to the project’s repository contained an error, and wants to undo it. Jennifer wants to undo correctly so everyone in the project’s repository gets the correct change. The command git revert [erroneous commit ID]
will create a new commit that reverses the erroneous commit.
The command git revert
is different from git checkout [commit ID]
because git checkout
returns the files not yet committed within the local repository to a previous state, whereas git revert
reverses changes committed to the local and project repositories.
Below are the right steps and explanations for Jennifer to use git revert
, what is the missing command?
________ # Look at the git history of the project to find the commit ID
- Copy the ID (the first few characters of the ID, e.g. 0b1d055).
git revert [commit ID]
- Type in the new commit message.
- Save and close
The command git log
lists project history with commit IDs.
The command git show HEAD
shows changes made at the latest commit, and lists the commit ID; however, Jennifer should double-check it is the correct commit, and no one else has committed changes to the repository.
Understanding Workflow and History
What is the output of the last command in
BASH
cd planets
echo "Venus is beautiful and full of love" > venus.txt
git add venus.txt
echo "Venus is too hot to be suitable as a base" >> venus.txt
git commit -m "Comment on Venus as an unsuitable base"
git checkout HEAD venus.txt
cat venus.txt #this will print the contents of venus.txt to the screen
Option 1Venus is too hot to be suitable as a base
Option 2Venus is beautiful and full of love
Option 3Venus is beautiful and full of love
Venus is too hot to be suitable as a base
Option 4Error because you have changed venus.txt without committing the changes
The answer is option 2.
The command git add venus.txt
places the current version of venus.txt
into the staging area. The changes to the file from the second echo
command are only applied to the working copy, not the version in the staging area.
So, when git commit -m "Comment on Venus as an unsuitable base"
is executed, the version of venus.txt
committed to the repository is the one from the staging area and has only one line.
At this time, the working copy still has the second line (and git status
will show that the file is modified). However, git checkout HEAD venus.txt
replaces the working copy with the most recently committed version of venus.txt
.
So, cat venus.txt
will output
OUTPUT
Venus is beautiful and full of love.
Explore and Summarize Histories
Exploring history is an important part of Git, and often it is a challenge to find the right commit ID, especially if the commit is from several months ago.
Imagine the planets
project has more than 50 files. You would like to find a commit that modifies some specific text in mars.txt
. When you type git log
, a very long list appeared. How can you narrow down the search?
Recall that the git diff
command allows us to explore one specific file, e.g., git diff mars.txt
. We can apply a similar idea here.
BASH
$ git log mars.txt
Unfortunately some of these commit messages are very ambiguous, e.g., update files
. How can you search through these files?
Both git diff
and git log
are very useful and they summarize a different part of the history for you. Is it possible to combine both? Let’s try the following:
BASH
$ git log --patch mars.txt
You should get a long list of output, and you should be able to see both commit messages andthe difference between each commit.
Question: What does the following command do?
BASH
git log --patch HEAD~9 *.txt